GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs HD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	762	89
Place by popularity	not in top-100	15
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	45.93
Power efficiency	14.35	16.93
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT2	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 August 2016 (8 years ago)	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2176
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm++	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	224.4
Floating-point processing power	0.4224 TFLOPS	7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	64
TMUs	24	136
Tensor Cores	no data	272
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P630 3.12

RTX 2060 Super 42.94
+1276%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P630 1198

RTX 2060 Super 16509
+1278%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −1375%	118 +1375%
1440p	4−5 −1575%	67 +1575%
4K	3−4 −1333%	43 +1333%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.38
1440p	no data	5.96
4K	no data	9.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −727%	91 +727%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1157%	88 +1157%
Elden Ring	6−7 −1917%	121 +1917%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1025%	90 +1025%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −564%	73 +564%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1000%	77 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1529%	228 +1529%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −2017%	127 +2017%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1009%	122 +1009%
Valorant	2−3 −10000%	202 +10000%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1850%	156 +1850%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −482%	64 +482%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −857%	67 +857%
Dota 2	9−10 −1667%	159 +1667%
Elden Ring	6−7 −2200%	138 +2200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −618%	122 +618%
Fortnite	16−18 −776%	149 +776%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1214%	184 +1214%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 −1444%	139 +1444%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1417%	91 +1417%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −761%	241 +761%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −436%	59 +436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1309%	150−160 +1309%
Valorant	2−3 −5150%	105 +5150%
World of Tanks	55−60 −407%	270−280 +407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −925%	82 +925%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −436%	59 +436%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −729%	58 +729%
Dota 2	9−10 −1956%	185 +1956%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −494%	100−110 +494%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1014%	156 +1014%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −354%	127 +354%
Valorant	2−3 −8900%	180 +8900%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −8500%	86 +8500%
Elden Ring	3−4 −2500%	78 +2500%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −8500%	86 +8500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −695%	170−180 +695%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1800%	38 +1800%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1132%	270−280 +1132%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2367%	74 +2367%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −333%	39 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1167%	38 +1167%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1625%	130−140 +1625%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −11300%	114 +11300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1825%	75−80 +1825%
Valorant	10−11 −1040%	114 +1040%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −419%	83 +419%
Elden Ring	1−2 −3300%	34 +3300%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −453%	83 +453%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1433%	138 +1433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −419%	83 +419%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2000%	42 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18 +1700%
Dota 2	16−18 −656%	121 +656%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2100%	65−70 +2100%
Fortnite	2−3 −3050%	60−65 +3050%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	65
Valorant	3−4 −1867%	59 +1867%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	23 +0%	23 +0%
Metro Exodus	31 +0%	31 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is 1375% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Super is 1575% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Super is 1333% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 11300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is ahead in 58 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.12	42.94
Recency	5 August 2016	9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	175 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Super, on the other hand, has a 1276.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 370.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.