Arc A580 vs HD Graphics P630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics P630 and Arc A580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc A580 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 894% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 775 | 196 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 58 |
| Power efficiency | 14.20 | 12.11 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | DG2-512 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 10 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 21,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm++ | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 384.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4224 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 3 | 96 |
| TMUs | 24 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 384 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.3 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 10−12
−930%
| 103
+930%
|
| 1440p | 5−6
−1020%
| 56
+1020%
|
| 4K | 3−4
−1000%
| 33
+1000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 7−8
−2029%
|
149
+2029%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−4038%
|
331
+4038%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1117%
|
73
+1117%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 7−8
−1471%
|
110
+1471%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−990%
|
100−110
+990%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−3188%
|
263
+3188%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−983%
|
65
+983%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−2133%
|
134
+2133%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−800%
|
130−140
+800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−664%
|
107
+664%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6
−2360%
|
123
+2360%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−785%
|
110−120
+785%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−304%
|
180−190
+304%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 7−8
−1029%
|
79
+1029%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−990%
|
100−110
+990%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−1513%
|
129
+1513%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 55−60
−393%
|
270−280
+393%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−850%
|
57
+850%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−864%
|
270−280
+864%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1933%
|
122
+1933%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−800%
|
130−140
+800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−629%
|
102
+629%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6
−2180%
|
114
+2180%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8−9
−975%
|
86
+975%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−1840%
|
97
+1840%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−785%
|
110−120
+785%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−1833%
|
174
+1833%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−304%
|
180−190
+304%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−990%
|
100−110
+990%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−783%
|
53
+783%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−864%
|
270−280
+864%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1800%
|
114
+1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−521%
|
87
+521%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−785%
|
110−120
+785%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−656%
|
68
+656%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−304%
|
180−190
+304%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 14−16
−800%
|
130−140
+800%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80
+2567%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−857%
|
200−210
+857%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−1750%
|
37
+1750%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−5600%
|
57
+5600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−600%
|
170−180
+600%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−700%
|
220−230
+700%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1850%
|
39
+1850%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1640%
|
87
+1640%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−971%
|
75
+971%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−1275%
|
55
+1275%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
−1340%
|
70−75
+1340%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
−1050%
|
21−24
+1050%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−138%
|
38
+138%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−1053%
|
170−180
+1053%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2000%
|
21
+2000%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−838%
|
75−80
+838%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1467%
|
47
+1467%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2700%
|
56
+2700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−725%
|
30−35
+725%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−750%
|
30−35
+750%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 61
+0%
|
61
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics P630 and Arc A580 compete in popular games:
- Arc A580 is 930% faster in 1080p
- Arc A580 is 1020% faster in 1440p
- Arc A580 is 1000% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A580 is 5600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc A580 is ahead in 54 tests (90%)
- there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.68 | 26.65 |
| Recency | 5 August 2016 | 10 October 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 175 Watt |
HD Graphics P630 has 1066.7% lower power consumption.
Arc A580, on the other hand, has a 894.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 370.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
