Radeon Pro Vega II vs HD Graphics P4700
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 100 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 16.38 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.93 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 (2013) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Haswell GT2 | Vega 20 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1574 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 392 million | 13,230 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 86 Watt | 475 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 26.00 | 440.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.416 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 20 | 256 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | Apple MPX |
| Width | IGP | Quad-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 806 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 825.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2013 | 3 June 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 86 Watt | 475 Watt |
HD Graphics P4700 has 452.3% lower power consumption.
Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P4700 and Radeon Pro Vega II. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that HD Graphics P4700 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
