Quadro RTX 6000 vs HD Graphics (Haswell)

Place in the ranking	1147	71
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.70
Power efficiency	no data	12.83
Architecture	Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Haswell GT1	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 October 2012 (12 years ago)	13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10	4608
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	509.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	288
Tensor Cores	no data	576
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	24 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−4900%

300−350
+4900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

21.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5500%	280−290 +5500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −5525%	450−500 +5525%
Valorant	30−33 −5567%	1700−1750 +5567%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	21−24 −5376%	1150−1200 +5376%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%
Dota 2	12−14 −5285%	700−750 +5285%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5500%	280−290 +5500%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −5525%	450−500 +5525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Valorant	30−33 −5567%	1700−1750 +5567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%
Dota 2	12−14 −5285%	700−750 +5285%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5500%	280−290 +5500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −5525%	450−500 +5525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −5500%	280−290 +5500%
Valorant	30−33 −5567%	1700−1750 +5567%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	4−5 −5400%	220−230 +5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −5500%	280−290 +5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

−5400%

55−60
+5400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −5567%	850−900 +5567%
Valorant	5−6 −5500%	280−290 +5500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3
−5400%

110−120

+5400%

This is how HD Graphics (Haswell) and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 is 4900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.84	47.86
Recency	1 October 2012	13 August 2018
Chip lithography	22 nm	12 nm

RTX 6000 has a 5597.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Haswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Haswell) is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

HD Graphics (Haswell)

Quadro RTX 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics (Haswell)

Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Quadro RTX 6000

A10G

HD Graphics (Haswell)

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Mobility Radeon HD 5450

Quadro T2000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 29 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Haswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Haswell) or Quadro RTX 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.