Quadro T2000 Mobile vs HD Graphics 2500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with Quadro T2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T2000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 2877% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1225 | 305 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 24.21 |
Architecture | Generation 7.0 (2012−2013) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | Ivy Bridge GT1 | TU117 |
Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 April 2012 (13 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Number of transistors | 392 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 60 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 6.900 | 114.2 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1104 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 1 | 32 |
TMUs | 6 | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 8
−2775%
| 230−240
+2775%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4000%
|
40−45
+4000%
|
God of War | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4000%
|
40−45
+4000%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1480%
|
75−80
+1480%
|
God of War | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−825%
|
70−75
+825%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−418%
|
140−150
+418%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12
−1842%
|
230−240
+1842%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4000%
|
40−45
+4000%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
−817%
|
110−120
+817%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1480%
|
75−80
+1480%
|
God of War | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−4100%
|
40−45
+4100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−825%
|
70−75
+825%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−817%
|
55−60
+817%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−418%
|
140−150
+418%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4000%
|
40−45
+4000%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
−817%
|
110−120
+817%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1480%
|
75−80
+1480%
|
God of War | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−825%
|
70−75
+825%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−817%
|
55−60
+817%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−418%
|
140−150
+418%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4
−4600%
|
140−150
+4600%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2343%
|
170−180
+2343%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2350%
|
45−50
+2350%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−2675%
|
110−120
+2675%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Fortnite | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Fortnite | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Valorant | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
God of War | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
God of War | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics 2500 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T2000 Mobile is 2775% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 4600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- T2000 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
- there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.64 | 19.05 |
Recency | 1 April 2012 | 27 May 2019 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm |
T2000 Mobile has a 2876.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.