ATI Radeon E4690 vs HD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 620 with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 620
2016
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
2.38
+131%

HD Graphics 620 outperforms ATI E4690 by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8511103
Place by popularity65not in top-100
Power efficiency11.142.41
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192320
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0019.20
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs38
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusMXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.0
Vulkan+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 620 2.38
+131%
ATI E4690 1.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 620 935
+131%
ATI E4690 405

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+133%
6−7
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Fortnite 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 43
+139%
18−20
−139%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Valorant 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Valorant 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how HD Graphics 620 and ATI E4690 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 620 is 133% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 1.03
Recency 30 August 2016 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

HD Graphics 620 has a 131.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a notebook card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2810 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 620 or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.