H3C XG310 vs HD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking912not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.50no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2DG1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 August 2016 (9 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768 ×4
Core clock speed300 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0052.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs324 ×4
TMUs2448 ×4
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

HD Graphics 620 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1900% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 620 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a notebook graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3126 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 620 or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.