H3C XG310 vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1DG1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768 ×4
Core clock speed320 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20052.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs224 ×4
TMUs1248 ×4
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 11 November 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 300 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 4900% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.