GeForce GT 610 PCI vs HD Graphics 610

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking909not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.56no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT1GF119
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9648
Core clock speed300 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate10.806.480
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared667 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.67 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 29 Watt

HD Graphics 610 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 480% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 610 and GeForce GT 610 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCI
GeForce GT 610 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 531 vote

Rate HD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 610 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.