Radeon RX 6400 vs HD Graphics 6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 6000 with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 6000
2014
15 Watt
2.04

RX 6400 outperforms HD Graphics 6000 by a whopping 802% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.68
Power efficiency9.9625.46
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed300 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistors189 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60111.4
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs632
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 6000 2.04
RX 6400 18.41
+802%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 6000 849
RX 6400 7644
+800%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−767%
130−140
+767%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Fortnite 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
Valorant 40−45
−775%
350−400
+775%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−733%
350−400
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Dota 2 17
−782%
150−160
+782%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Fortnite 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Valorant 40−45
−775%
350−400
+775%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Dota 2 15
−767%
130−140
+767%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Valorant 40−45
−775%
350−400
+775%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−800%
180−190
+800%
Valorant 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Valorant 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

This is how HD Graphics 6000 and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 767% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 18.41
Recency 5 September 2014 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 53 Watt

HD Graphics 6000 has 253.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 802.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 6000 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 6000
HD Graphics 6000
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 271 vote

Rate HD Graphics 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2149 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 6000 or Radeon RX 6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.