Radeon RX 6400 vs HD Graphics 5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5000 and Radeon RX 6400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 5000
2013
30 Watt
1.52

RX 6400 outperforms HD Graphics 5000 by a whopping 1195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking970276
Place by popularitynot in top-100100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.32
Power efficiency3.5125.72
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320768
Core clock speed200 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate40.00111.4
Floating-point processing power0.64 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 5000 1.52
RX 6400 19.69
+1195%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5000 585
RX 6400 7598
+1199%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−1100%
120−130
+1100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

This is how HD Graphics 5000 and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 1100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 19.69
Recency 27 May 2013 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 53 Watt

HD Graphics 5000 has 76.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 1195.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5000
HD Graphics 5000
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 181 vote

Rate HD Graphics 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1883 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.