Radeon R9 290X2 vs HD Graphics 6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking854not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.22no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3Hawaii
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)24 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842816
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt580 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60176.0
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS5.632 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48176

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data345.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 24 June 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 580 Watt

HD Graphics 6000 has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 3766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 6000 and Radeon R9 290X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 6000 is a notebook card while Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 6000
HD Graphics 6000
AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 256 votes

Rate HD Graphics 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.