GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs HD Graphics 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 3000 4000 4200 4400 4600 5000 5300 5500 5600 6000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTS 150 OEM GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 6000 with GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 6000
2014
15 Watt
1.92

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms HD Graphics 6000 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking918731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.362.89
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3GF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)15 March 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed300 MHz783 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate45.6025.06
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs616
TMUs4832
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared902 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.73 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−80%
27−30
+80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Fortnite 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Valorant 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Dota 2 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Fortnite 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Valorant 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Dota 2 15
−80%
27−30
+80%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Valorant 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Valorant 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Valorant 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how HD Graphics 6000 and GTS 450 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 80% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.92 3.78
Recency 5 September 2014 15 March 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 106 Watt

HD Graphics 6000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 606.7% lower power consumption.

GTS 450 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 96.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 6000 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics 6000
HD Graphics 6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
vs
GT 755M Mac Edition GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
vs
UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 617
Quadro 1000M Quadro 1000M
vs
9600 GTX 9600 GTX
Quadro 1000M Quadro 1000M
vs
9600 GSO 9600 GSO
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
vs
8200M G 8200M G
GT 720M NVIDIA GT 720M
vs
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile 48EU Mobile
R5 M230 AMD R5 M230
vs
GeForce 310M 310M
HD Graphics 6000 Intel Graphics 6000
vs
Radeon 740M 740M
GT 540M NVIDIA GT 540M
vs
GT 650M Mac Edition 650M Mac Edition
GT 540M NVIDIA GT 540M
vs
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Cores iGPU
HD 8610G AMD HD 8610G
vs
UHD Graphics 770 770
HD Graphics 4600 Intel Graphics 4600
vs
GeForce 405M 405M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 290 votes

Rate HD Graphics 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 6000 or GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.