Radeon 820M vs HD Graphics 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 530 and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 530
2015
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
2.39
+85.3%

HD Graphics 530 outperforms 820M by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8711053
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.14no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Krackan Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)2 June 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192128
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed950 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.3648 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount64 GBno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Shared7500 MHz
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+100%
7−8
−100%
4K7
+133%
3−4
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 20
+400%
4−5
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Valorant 40−45
+26.5%
30−35
−26.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Fortnite 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 40−45
+26.5%
30−35
−26.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 20
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−133%
7−8
+133%
Valorant 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Valorant 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD Graphics 530 and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 530 is 100% faster in 1080p
  • HD Graphics 530 is 133% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 530 is 600% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 820M is 133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 530 performs better in 42 tests (93%)
  • Radeon 820M performs better in 2 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.39 1.29
Recency 1 September 2015 2 June 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

HD Graphics 530 has a 85.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon 820M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1769 votes

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 530 or Radeon 820M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.