Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs HD Graphics 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

HD Graphics 520
2015
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.15
+76.2%

HD Graphics 520 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4670 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking8241012
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.190.10
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2M96-XT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)9 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Current price$309 $143

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 520 has 90% better value for money than ATI Mobility HD 4670.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24320
Core clock speed300 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2021.60
Floating-point performanceno data432.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 520 and Mobility Radeon HD 4670 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 520 2.15
+76.2%
ATI Mobility HD 4670 1.22

HD Graphics 520 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4670 by 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 520 5722
+90.4%
ATI Mobility HD 4670 3005

HD Graphics 520 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4670 by 90% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p20
+100%
10−12
−100%
Full HD12
+100%
6−7
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 no data
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 no data
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 no data

This is how HD Graphics 520 and ATI Mobility HD 4670 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 520 is 100% faster in 900p
  • HD Graphics 520 is 100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.15 1.22
Recency 1 September 2015 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The HD Graphics 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2669 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.