FireGL X3-256 vs HD Graphics 515

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking974not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2R420
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)3 August 2004 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099
Current price$512 $143 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24no data
Core clock speed300 MHz491 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt57 Watt
Texture fill rate22.805.892

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 515 and FireGL X3-256 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared908 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data29.06 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.97N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 3 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 57 Watt

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 515 and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 515 is a notebook card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 515
HD Graphics 515
ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 60 votes

Rate HD Graphics 515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.