ATI Radeon X1600 vs HD Graphics 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 510 with Radeon X1600, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 510
2015
32 GB LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
1.61
+1138%

HD Graphics 510 outperforms ATI X1600 by a whopping 1138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9591438
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.350.33
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1RV516
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed300 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate10.802.540
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4DDR2
Maximum RAM amount32 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 510 1.61
+1138%
ATI X1600 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 510 622
+1169%
ATI X1600 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.61 0.13
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 27 Watt

HD Graphics 510 has a 1138.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook card while Radeon X1600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
ATI Radeon X1600
Radeon X1600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 375 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 59 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.