RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs HD Graphics 510

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 510 with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 510
2015
32 GB LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
1.56

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms HD Graphics 510 by a whopping 5410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9956
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.87
Power efficiency7.3610.13
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9624064
Core clock speed300 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors189 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate10.801,968
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs3192
TMUs12752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount32 GB96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 510 1.56
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 85.96
+5410%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 510 621
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 34320
+5427%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Fortnite 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Valorant 35−40
−5329%
1900−1950
+5329%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−5355%
1800−1850
+5355%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Dota 2 18−20
−5178%
950−1000
+5178%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Fortnite 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
Valorant 35−40
−5329%
1900−1950
+5329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Dota 2 18−20
−5178%
950−1000
+5178%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
Valorant 35−40
−5329%
1900−1950
+5329%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Valorant 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5400%
220−230
+5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5213%
850−900
+5213%
Valorant 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 85.96
Recency 1 September 2015 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

HD Graphics 510 has 3900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 5410.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 390 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 510 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.