Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs HD Graphics 505

Place in performance ranking	1088	1102
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.06	no data
Architecture	Gen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017)	Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code name	Apollo Lake	M96
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2016 (7 years ago)	5 May 2010 (13 years ago)
Current price	$659	$56

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	18	320
Core clock speed	300 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	750 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.70	17.60
Floating-point performance	230.4 gflops	352.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 505 and Mobility Radeon HD 560v compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.97	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 505 0.86
+7.5%

ATI Mobility HD 560v 0.80

HD Graphics 505 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 560v by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 505 2351

ATI Mobility HD 560v 2460
+4.6%

Mobility Radeon HD 560v outperforms HD Graphics 505 by 5% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

9
+12.5%

8−9

−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

This is how HD Graphics 505 and ATI Mobility HD 560v compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 505 is 12.5% faster than ATI Mobility HD 560v in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 505 is 25% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 560v.

All in all, in popular games:

HD Graphics 505 is ahead in 3 tests (12%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (88%)

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	0.86	0.80
Recency	1 September 2016	5 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt