Radeon Pro 5600M vs HD Graphics 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 505 510 515 520 530
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 5300M Pro 5500M Pro 5600M Pro W5300M Pro W5500M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 500 with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 500
2015
8 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 10 Watt
0.72

Pro 5600M outperforms HD Graphics 500 by a whopping 2983% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1226289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.2434.19
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1Navi 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)15 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate7.800164.8
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs12160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared770 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data394.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 500 0.72
Pro 5600M 22.20
+2983%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 500 302
Samples: 828
Pro 5600M 9304
+2981%
Samples: 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−2900%
300−350
+2900%
1440p1
−2900%
30−35
+2900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Valorant 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−1155%
250−260
+1155%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Dota 2 6
−1883%
110−120
+1883%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1000%
65−70
+1000%
Valorant 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Dota 2 5
−2280%
110−120
+2280%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1000%
65−70
+1000%
Valorant 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1500%
45−50
+1500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−3950%
160−170
+3950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2075%
170−180
+2075%

1440p
Ultra

Far Cry 5 1
−5000%
50−55
+5000%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−200%
40−45
+200%
Valorant 4−5
−3200%
130−140
+3200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 500 and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 2900% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5600M is 2900% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5600M is 7300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M performs better in 33 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.72 22.20
Recency 1 September 2015 15 June 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 50 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has 400% lower power consumption.

Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has a 2983% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 500 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
HD 6520G Radeon HD 6520G
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
GeForce 610M GeForce 610M
HD Graphics (Broadwell) HD Graphics (Broadwell)
vs
Arc A350 Arc A350
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
Go 7300 Go 7300
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
ATI X1650 Radeon X1650
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
FX Go5350 FX Go5350
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
HD 8950M HD 8950M
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
RTX 3090 RTX 3090
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
RTX 5050 RTX 5050
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 830 Adreno 830
R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
vs
ATI HD 4290 IGP HD 4290 IGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 792 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 85 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 500 or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.