GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4600 and GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 4600
2013
45 Watt
1.59
+16.9%

HD Graphics 4600 outperforms GT 650M Mac Edition by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking931980
Place by popularity61not in top-100
Power efficiency6.312.40
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)12 July 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160384
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0028.80
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1254 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.26 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14
+40%
10−12
−40%
Full HD11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Valorant 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Valorant 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Valorant 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD Graphics 4600 and GT 650M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 4600 is 40% faster in 900p
  • HD Graphics 4600 is 22% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 1.36
Recency 27 May 2013 12 July 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 4600 has a 16.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2623 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 20 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.