FireStream 9370 vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4600 with FireStream 9370, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4600
2013
45 Watt
1.80

FireStream 9370 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking924579
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency6.322.00
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Cypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)23 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601600
Core clock speed400 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0066.00
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 4600 1.80
FireStream 9370 6.42
+257%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4600 710
FireStream 9370 2528
+256%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14
−221%
45−50
+221%
Full HD11
−218%
35−40
+218%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Fortnite 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Valorant 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27
−252%
95−100
+252%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Dota 2 22
−241%
75−80
+241%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Fortnite 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
−250%
14−16
+250%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−250%
14−16
+250%
Valorant 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Dota 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Valorant 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Valorant 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Valorant 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

This is how HD Graphics 4600 and FireStream 9370 compete in popular games:

  • FireStream 9370 is 221% faster in 900p
  • FireStream 9370 is 218% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 6.42
Recency 27 May 2013 23 June 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt

HD Graphics 4600 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9370, on the other hand, has a 256.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The FireStream 9370 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook card while FireStream 9370 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2580 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or FireStream 9370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.