ATI FirePro V7800P vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking960not rated
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Power efficiency6.36no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Cypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)16 May 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601440
Core clock speed400 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt138 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0050.40
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2072

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 16 May 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 138 Watt

HD Graphics 4600 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 206.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4600 and FirePro V7800P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook card while FirePro V7800P is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
ATI FirePro V7800P
FirePro V7800P

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2754 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V7800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or FirePro V7800P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.