Radeon HD 6290 vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking973not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.04no data
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Zacate
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 June 2013 (10 years old)1 July 2011 (12 years old)
Current price$425 no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2080
Core clock speed200 MHz280 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors392 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate22.005.200
Floating-point performance46 gflops104 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 4400 and Radeon HD 6290 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 4400 522
+397%
HD 6290 105

HD Graphics 4400 outperforms Radeon HD 6290 by 397% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 4400 3583
+621%
HD 6290 497

HD Graphics 4400 outperforms Radeon HD 6290 by 621% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 4400 736
+311%
HD 6290 179

HD Graphics 4400 outperforms Radeon HD 6290 by 311% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 5 June 2013 1 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 1 GB
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 19 Watt

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4400 and Radeon HD 6290. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
AMD Radeon HD 6290
Radeon HD 6290

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1180 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.