Radeon 8040S vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4400 and Radeon 8040S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 4400
2013
20 Watt
1.25

8040S outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by a whopping 1895% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1082254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.8134.92
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Strix Halo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2013 (12 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601024
Core clock speed200 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors392 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate19.00179.2
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPS5.734 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2064
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 4400 1.25
Radeon 8040S 24.94
+1895%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4400 522
Samples: 4896
Radeon 8040S 10431
+1898%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−1817%
230−240
+1817%
Full HD10
−1800%
190−200
+1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 60−65

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Fortnite 11
−1018%
120−130
+1018%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Valorant 30−35
−421%
170−180
+421%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−807%
260−270
+807%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
Dota 2 15
−1833%
290−300
+1833%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Fortnite 3−4
−4000%
120−130
+4000%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 90−95
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1000%
75−80
+1000%
Valorant 30−35
−421%
170−180
+421%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
Dota 2 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1000%
75−80
+1000%
Valorant 30−35
−1870%
650−700
+1870%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−4000%
120−130
+4000%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1823%
250−260
+1823%
Valorant 3−4
−6900%
210−220
+6900%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 24−27
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2100%
65−70
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−250%
45−50
+250%
Valorant 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 4400 and Radeon 8040S compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8040S is 1817% faster in 900p
  • Radeon 8040S is 1800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 8040S is 9800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8040S performs better in 38 tests (75%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 24.94
Recency 3 September 2013 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 55 Watt

HD Graphics 4400 has 175% lower power consumption.

Radeon 8040S, on the other hand, has a 1895% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8040S is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1727 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 8040S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4400 or Radeon 8040S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.