Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4600
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4400 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4400
2013
20 Watt
1.24

T1000 Max-Q outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by a whopping 1190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4400
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1039329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.6023.72
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 September 2013 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160896
Core clock speed200 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors392 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate19.0075.60
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 4400 1.24
T1000 Max-Q 15.99
+1190%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4400 522
T1000 Max-Q 6741
+1191%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Full HD10
−1100%
120−130
+1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Fortnite 11
−718%
90−95
+718%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−578%
60−65
+578%
Valorant 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−628%
210−220
+628%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Dota 2 15
−560%
95−100
+560%
Fortnite 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−578%
60−65
+578%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
Valorant 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Dota 2 16−18
−482%
95−100
+482%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−578%
60−65
+578%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
Valorant 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 30−35
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1115%
150−160
+1115%
Valorant 5−6
−3160%
160−170
+3160%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Valorant 6−7
−1417%
90−95
+1417%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Dota 2 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 4400 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 1150% faster in 900p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 1100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 6900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 43 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (33%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.24 15.99
Recency 3 September 2013 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

HD Graphics 4400 has 150% lower power consumption.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1189.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4400
vs
HD 8650G Radeon HD 8650G
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4400
vs
GT 425M GeForce GT 425M
HD 6450 OEM HD 6450 OEM
vs
R5 M240 R5 M240
HD 8240 HD 8240
vs
GT 540M GT 540M
PlayStation 4 GPU PlayStation 4 GPU
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
8400 GS 8400 GS
vs
HD 7610M HD 7610M
ATI 3000 IGP 3000 IGP
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
Radeon 625 625
vs
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M
vs
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
GeForce 310M 310M
vs
GTX 1080 GTX 1080
R9 270 R9 270
vs
R9 Nano R9 Nano

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 1508 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4400 or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.