Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs HD Graphics 4400

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4400 with Iris Plus Graphics 950, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4400
2013
20 Watt
1.36

Iris Plus Graphics 950 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by a whopping 381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1020571
Place by popularity97not in top-100
Power efficiency4.6729.92
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2013 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160512
Core clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors392 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.0032.00
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4400 1.36
Iris Plus Graphics 950 6.54
+381%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4400 522
Iris Plus Graphics 950 2519
+383%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−358%
55−60
+358%
Full HD9
−344%
40−45
+344%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
−350%
18−20
+350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

This is how HD Graphics 4400 and Iris Plus Graphics 950 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics 950 is 358% faster in 900p
  • Iris Plus Graphics 950 is 344% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 6.54
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has a 380.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1452 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.