GeForce GT 1010 vs HD Graphics 4400

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4400 with GeForce GT 1010, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4400
2013
20 Watt
1.33

GT 1010 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1029762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.667.18
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2013 (11 years ago)13 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160256
Core clock speed200 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors392 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate19.0023.49
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPS0.7516 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data147 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 4400 1.33
GT 1010 3.07
+131%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4400 522
GT 1010 1208
+131%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Full HD10
−110%
21−24
+110%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Fortnite 11
−118%
24−27
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Valorant 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Dota 2 15
−100%
30−33
+100%
Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Valorant 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Valorant 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Valorant 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Valorant 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

This is how HD Graphics 4400 and GT 1010 compete in popular games:

  • GT 1010 is 125% faster in 900p
  • GT 1010 is 110% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 3.07
Recency 3 September 2013 13 January 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 30 Watt

HD Graphics 4400 has 50% lower power consumption.

GT 1010, on the other hand, has a 130.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 1010 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 1010 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GeForce GT 1010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1486 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 534 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4400 or GeForce GT 1010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.