Radeon RX 7500 XT vs HD Graphics 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1121not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 June 2013 (11 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores201024
Core clock speed200 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors392 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate17.00147.2
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPSno data
ROPs232
TMUs2064
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data216.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 100 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has 2400% lower power consumption.

RX 7500 XT, on the other hand, has a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4200 and Radeon RX 7500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4200 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7500 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT
Radeon RX 7500 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 39 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 52 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.