Radeon HD 2600 XT vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 405 with Radeon HD 2600 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 405
2016
6 Watt
0.72

ATI HD 2600 XT outperforms HD Graphics 405 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11261123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBraswellRV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current price$254 $144 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 405 and ATI HD 2600 XT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16120
Core clock speed320 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate11.206.400
Floating-point performance213.1 gflops192 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 405 and Radeon HD 2600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+0%
16−18
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

This is how HD Graphics 405 and ATI HD 2600 XT compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.73
Recency 1 April 2016 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between HD Graphics 405 and Radeon HD 2600 XT.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 181 vote

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 75 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.