Radeon HD 2600 XT vs HD Graphics 630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics 630
2017
65536 Mb DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
3.09
+323%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms Radeon HD 2600 XT by 323% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7181120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2RV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)28 June 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current price$370 $144 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 630 and ATI HD 2600 XT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24120
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate26.406.400
Floating-point performance441.6 gflops192 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 630 3.09
+323%
ATI HD 2600 XT 0.73

HD Graphics 630 outperforms Radeon HD 2600 XT by 323% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 630 1197
+324%
ATI HD 2600 XT 282

HD Graphics 630 outperforms Radeon HD 2600 XT by 324% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+400%
3−4
−400%
1440p64
+357%
14−16
−357%
4K13
+333%
3−4
−333%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Hitman 3 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Hitman 3 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hitman 3 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how HD Graphics 630 and ATI HD 2600 XT compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 400% faster than ATI HD 2600 XT in 1080p
  • HD Graphics 630 is 357% faster than ATI HD 2600 XT in 1440p
  • HD Graphics 630 is 333% faster than ATI HD 2600 XT in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 0.73
Recency 1 January 2017 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1084 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 66 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.