Tesla K80m vs HD Graphics 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1070not rated
Place by popularity34not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameIvy BridgeGK210
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 March 2011 (13 years ago)17 November 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162x 2496
Core clock speed350 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown300 Watt
Texture fill rate20.802x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance0.3328 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2x 12 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.80-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 March 2011 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 4000 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4000 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 5035 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.