RTX A4500 vs HD Graphics 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4000 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4000
2011
1.18

RTX A4500 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 4674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking103037
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.135.21
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameIvy BridgeGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 March 2011 (13 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$91 $2591

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A4500 has 3908% better value for money than HD Graphics 4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores167168
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown200 Watt
Texture fill rate20.80369.6
Floating-point performance33.6 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 4000 and RTX A4500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4000 1.18
RTX A4500 56.33
+4674%

RTX A4500 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 4674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 4000 454
RTX A4500 21755
+4692%

RTX A4500 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 4692% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−4483%
550−600
+4483%
Full HD11
−4445%
500−550
+4445%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 2−3
Hitman 3 0−1 3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 8−9
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 10−12

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 2−3
Hitman 3 0−1 3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 10−12

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 10−12

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 2−3

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 0−1 7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 4−5
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 4−5

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2
Metro Exodus 0−1 4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 2−3

This is how HD Graphics 4000 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 4483% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4500 is 4445% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 56.33
Recency 23 March 2011 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4874 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 183 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.