RTX A2000 vs HD Graphics 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics 4000
2011
1.17

RTX A2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 2942% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1027130
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1318.85
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameIvy BridgeGA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 March 2011 (13 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current price$91 $567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 has 14400% better value for money than HD Graphics 4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163328
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown70 Watt
Texture fill rate20.80124.8
Floating-point performance33.6 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 4000 and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4000 1.17
RTX A2000 35.59
+2942%

RTX A2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 2942% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 4000 454
RTX A2000 13773
+2934%

RTX A2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 2934% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Full HD11
−2627%
300−350
+2627%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2900%
240−250
+2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Hitman 3 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%

This is how HD Graphics 4000 and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 2817% faster in 900p
  • RTX A2000 is 2627% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 35.59
Recency 23 March 2011 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 6 GB
Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4745 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 509 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.