Radeon R7 A360 vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 and Radeon R7 A360, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 400
2015
8 GB DDR3L, 6 Watt
1.04

R7 A360 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11431029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.33no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Meso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed320 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1125 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.20027.00
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs1224
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 1.47
Recency 1 April 2015 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 400 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R7 A360, on the other hand, has a 41.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

The Radeon R7 A360 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
AMD Radeon R7 A360
Radeon R7 A360

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 454 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Radeon R7 A360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.