GeForce RTX 5090 vs HD Graphics 400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1078not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.92no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9621760
Core clock speed320 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2001,714
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS109.7 TFLOPS
ROPs2192
TMUs12680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1875 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.52 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-10.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 500 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 8233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 416 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 397 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.