GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs HD Graphics 400

Place in performance ranking	1041	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	30.36
Architecture	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Braswell GT1	AD103-275
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)	24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799
Current price	$710	$820 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 400 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	8448
Core clock speed	320 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	640 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.680	689.0
Floating-point performance	134.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	IGP	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.80	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 400 1.13

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.07
+7163%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 7163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 400 450

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 52738
+11620%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 11620% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −10700%	216 +10700%
1440p	2−3 −7400%	150 +7400%
4K	1−2 −9100%	92 +9100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −13000%	130−140 +13000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −7350%	140−150 +7350%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −8033%	240−250 +8033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −11900%	120−130 +11900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −9950%	200−210 +9950%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −8267%	250−260 +8267%
Hitman 3	1−2 −12200%	120−130 +12200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −8575%	300−350 +8575%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −7350%	140−150 +7350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −12300%	120−130 +12300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −7683%	467 +7683%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −8450%	171 +8450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −13000%	130−140 +13000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −7350%	140−150 +7350%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −8033%	240−250 +8033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −11900%	120−130 +11900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −9950%	200−210 +9950%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −8267%	250−260 +8267%
Hitman 3	1−2 −12200%	120−130 +12200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −8575%	300−350 +8575%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −7350%	140−150 +7350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −12300%	120−130 +12300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −7267%	442 +7267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −8500%	430 +8500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −14400%	140−150 +14400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −13000%	130−140 +13000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −7350%	140−150 +7350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −11900%	120−130 +11900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −8267%	250−260 +8267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −8575%	300−350 +8575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −8040%	407 +8040%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −10400%	210 +10400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −14300%	144 +14300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−12300%

120−130
+12300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −8200%	160−170 +8200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −14300%	140−150 +14300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −9800%	95−100 +9800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −10700%	100−110 +10700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −11100%	110−120 +11100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −9250%	187 +9250%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −10500%	210−220 +10500%
Hitman 3	1−2 −12000%	120−130 +12000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −7333%	220−230 +7333%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −12700%	120−130 +12700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −7550%	306 +7550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −7850%	159 +7850%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −11500%	116 +11500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−12500%

120−130
+12500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −8700%	85−90 +8700%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	65−70
Hitman 3	1−2 −7500%	75−80 +7500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −13500%	130−140 +13500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −10900%	110 +10900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −13000%	130−140 +13000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	70−75
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	65−70
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Far Cry 5	0−1	50−55
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −8150%	160−170 +8150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −13500%	130−140 +13500%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −10000%	100−110 +10000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	69

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−9800%

95−100
+9800%

This is how HD Graphics 400 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 10700% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 7400% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 9100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.13	82.07
Recency	1 April 2015	24 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	285 Watt