GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400
2015
8 GB DDR3L, 6 Watt
1.04
RTX 3070 Ti
2021, $599
8 GB GDDR6X, 290 Watt
55.65
+5251%

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 5251% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking114650
Place by popularitynot in top-10094
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.07
Power efficiency13.3514.78
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)31 May 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores966144
Core clock speed320 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors189 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200339.8
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs12192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data608.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 400 1.04
RTX 3070 Ti 55.65
+5251%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 400 450
RTX 3070 Ti 37590
+8253%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5333%
163
+5333%
1440p1−2
−8600%
87
+8600%
4K1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.67
1440pno data6.89
4Kno data10.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 350
+0%
350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 178
+0%
178
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 219
+0%
219
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 337
+0%
337
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 205
+0%
205
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210
+0%
210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 266
+0%
266
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Dota 2 249
+0%
249
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 145
+0%
145
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+0%
294
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Dota 2 230
+0%
230
+0%
Far Cry 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144
+0%
144
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 160
+0%
160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+0%
113
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Dota 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 400 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 5333% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 8600% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 5600% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 55.65
Recency 1 April 2015 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 290 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 4733% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 5251% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 457 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8106 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.