ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)no data
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Rage LT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)1 November 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed320 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.2000.08
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPSno data
ROPs21
TMUs121

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LSDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.31.1
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 November 1997
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 350 nm

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 457 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.