Intel HD Graphics 400 vs ATI 3D Rage II

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
not rated
Generation 8.0
GPU code name
Braswell GT1
Mach64 GT-B
Market segment
Launch date
1 April 2015 (6 years ago)
5 September 1996 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
Price now

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
Core clock speed
320 MHz
60 MHz
Boost clock speed
640 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
189 million
5 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
500 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
6 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
134.4 gflops
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 3.0 x1


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
4 MB
Memory bus width
no data
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
no data
83 MHz
Memory bandwidth
no data
664.0 MB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
1x VGA

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 (11_1)
Shader Model
no data

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 400

Much newer (1 April 2015 vs 5 September 1996)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 500 nm)

Advantages of ATI 3D Rage II

Cheaper ($117 vs $120)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between Intel HD Graphics 400 and ATI 3D Rage II. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics 400
ATI 3D Rage II

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.