UHD Graphics 730 vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
2016
0.45

UHD Graphics 730 outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 824% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1252694
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Power efficiencyno data19.07
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBraswellRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12192
Core clock speed320 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−775%
70−75
+775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Valorant 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Valorant 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Valorant 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Valorant 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

This is how HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 is 775% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.45 4.16
Recency 1 April 2016 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 730 has a 824.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 244 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1345 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or UHD Graphics 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.