Quadro T500 Mobile vs HD Graphics 3000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

T500 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 1282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1185477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data35.32
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)2 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96896
Core clock speed650 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown18 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6094.92
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
T500 Mobile 9.12
+1282%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 3000 2503
T500 Mobile 23453
+837%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−300%
36
+300%
1440p1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
4K1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−180%
28
+180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−90%
19
+90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 300% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T500 Mobile is 2750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is ahead in 26 tests (39%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (61%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 9.12
Recency 1 February 2011 2 December 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

T500 Mobile has a 1281.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2399 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 102 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.