GeForce 320M vs HD Graphics 2500
Aggregate performance score
HD Graphics 2500 outperforms GeForce 320M by a significant 26% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1137 | 1181 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012) | GT2xx (2009−2012) |
GPU code name | Ivy Bridge GT1 | MCP89 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 April 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) |
Current price | $521 | $408 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
HD Graphics 2500 and GeForce 320M have a nearly equal value for money.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 392 million | 486 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 23 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 6.900 | 7.200 |
Floating-point performance | 13.8 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on HD Graphics 2500 and GeForce 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
HD Graphics 2500 outperforms GeForce 320M by 26% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
HD Graphics 2500 outperforms GeForce 320M by 4% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 7
−85.7%
| 13
+85.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics 2500 and GeForce 320M compete in popular games:
- GeForce 320M is 86% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics 2500 is 33% faster than the GeForce 320M.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics 2500 is ahead in 7 tests (23%)
- there's a draw in 24 tests (77%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.68 | 0.54 |
Recency | 1 April 2012 | 1 April 2010 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 40 nm |
The HD Graphics 2500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.