HD Graphics 4400 vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated973
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data0.04
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)5 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$318 $425

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores620
Core clock speed850/1100 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors189 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown20 Watt
Texture fill rate8.10022.00
Floating-point performance10.2 gflops46 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 2000 and HD Graphics 4400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.14.3
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 2000 213
HD Graphics 4400 522
+145%

HD Graphics 4400 outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by 145% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 2000 896
HD Graphics 4400 3583
+300%

HD Graphics 4400 outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by 300% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 February 2011 5 June 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2000 and HD Graphics 4400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1118 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1191 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.