GeForce MX550 vs HD Graphics 2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 and GeForce MX550, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.53

MX550 outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 2030% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1237427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data31.92
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1TU117S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481024
Core clock speed850 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1320 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown25 Watt
Texture fill rate8.10042.24
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS2.703 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 2000 0.53
GeForce MX550 11.29
+2030%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213
GeForce MX550 4512
+2018%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896
GeForce MX550 36560
+3983%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−318%
46
+318%
4K1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Valorant 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−841%
160−170
+841%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Dota 2 10−12
−909%
111
+909%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−733%
50
+733%
Valorant 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Dota 2 10−12
−845%
104
+845%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−350%
27
+350%
Valorant 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 9−10
Far Cry 5 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Valorant 3−4
−1833%
55−60
+1833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+0%
55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and GeForce MX550 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX550 is 318% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX550 is 2700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX550 is 4050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX550 is ahead in 34 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 11.29
Recency 1 February 2011 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

GeForce MX550 has a 2030.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX550 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1379 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 860 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2000 or GeForce MX550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.