Radeon 625 vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated791
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.96
Architectureno dataGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameMach32Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 January 1993 (31 year ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed10 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 28 nm

Radeon 625 has an age advantage of 26 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and Radeon 625. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop card while Radeon 625 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 145 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.