A100 SXM4 40 GB vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCrestlineGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores86912
Core clock speed500 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rateno data609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPsno data160
TMUsno data432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data40 GB
Memory bus widthno data5120 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 14 May 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 400 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has 2976.9% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 40 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and A100 SXM4 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook card while A100 SXM4 40 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
A100 SXM4 40 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 158 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.