Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs ATI Radeon X800 GT

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
ATI Radeon X800 GT

General info

Comparison of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
not rated
 
not rated
Architecture
PowerVR SGX5
 
R400
Code name
Cedar Trail
 
R480
Type
Laptop
 
Desktop
Release date
1 November 2011
 
1 November 2005

Technical specs

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
4
 
no data
Core clock speed
no data
 
475 MHz
Boost Clock
400 MHz
 
no data
Transistor count
no data
 
160 million
Manufacturing process technology
32 nm
 
130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
 
40 Watt
Texture fill rate
no data
 
5.700

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface
no data
 
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
no data
 
DDR
Maximum RAM amount
no data
 
128 MB
Memory bus width
no data
 
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
no data
 
986 MHz
Memory bandwidth
no data
 
31.55 GB/s
Shared memory
+
 
no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT.
Display Connectors
no data
 
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API support

APIs supported by Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
DirectX 9.1
 
9.0b (9_2)
OpenGL
no data
 
2.0

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Much newer (1 November 2011 vs 1 November 2005)
Finer manufacturing process technology (32 vs 130 nm)
OpenGL 3.0

Advantages of ATI Radeon X800 GT

We are unaware of any advantages of ATI Radeon X800 GT over Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600.

So, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 or X800 GT?

Technical City couldn't decide between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and ATI Radeon X800 GT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 is a notebook card while Radeon X800 GT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon X800 GT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
ATI Radeon X800 GT
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 or Radeon X800 GT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.