GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking430not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGK180
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42880
Core clock speedno data875 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz928 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data222.7
Floating-point processing powerno data5.345 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1753 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2.175
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.