UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce4 Ti 4400

4 Ti 4200 4 Ti 4200-8X 4 Ti 4400 4 Ti 4600 4 Ti 4800 4 Ti 4800 SE
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 Ti 4400 with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 Ti 4400
2002
128 MB DDR
0.02

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms GeForce4 Ti 4400 by a whopping 19550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GeForce4 Ti 4400 GeForce4 Ti 4400
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1505665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.09
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNV25 A2Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed275 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors63 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed275 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112_1
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−117

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.02 3.93
Recency 6 February 2002 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 19550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4400 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 Ti 4400
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce4 Ti 4400 GeForce4 Ti 4400
vs
FX 5200 GeForce FX 5200
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce4 Ti 4400 GeForce4 Ti 4400
vs
FX 5500 GeForce FX 5500
Arc A580 Arc A580
vs
Quadro4 200 NVS 200 NVS
GT 240 NVIDIA GT 240
vs
FX 5600 5600
GeForce 405M GeForce 405M
vs
GeForce G103M G103M
RTX 4060 Ti NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti
vs
Riva TNT2 Ultra Ultra
RTX 4060 NVIDIA RTX 4060
vs
GeForce2 Ultra Ultra
GTX 1660 NVIDIA GTX 1660
vs
FX 5600 XT 5600 XT
ATI X550 Radeon X550
vs
6200 TurboCache 6200 TurboCache
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
vs
7900 GTO 7900 GTO
RTX 3070 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
8600 GT 8600 GT
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
vs
8800 GTS 512 8800 GTS 512

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 19 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 511 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 Ti 4400 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.